Skip to main content

Delhi District Commission Orders Shree Vardhman Developers To Refund Amount Paid By Homebuyer.

Very newly a judgment was given by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission directed Shree Vardhman Developers Pvt. Ltd to refund 48 Lakhs with interest to homebuyer for delayed possession and deficiency in service.

In this case, the complainant allotted a flat in the builder's project named Shree Vardhman Gardenia, Haryana and paid initial amount of Rs. 1,00,000.

The homebuyer takes a loan of Rs 41,48,001 for the purchase from ICICI Bank. The bank directly credited Rs 38,68,001 to the account of the builder.

He had signed a Flat Buyer's Agreement with the builder. As per the agreement, he was to bear the EMI payments of the loan till the date of possession was given to the homebuyer.

However, this quickly became frustrating when builder stopped paying EMI to the bank due to which financial stress was inflicted upon the homebuyer. This issue is attempted to be solved in many ways. Homebuyer has sent numerous letters to both the bank and the builder. All of his letters were ignored.

In addition, upon visiting the project site, it was discovered that construction was behind schedule. Consequently, the complainant opted to withdraw his step back from the project and demanded a refund of the amount paid.

Feeling aggrieved by the non-refund it lodged a complaint application before the CDRC, South Delhi seeking a refund of Rs. 46,38,001 along with 18% interest and Rs. 5,00,000 towards mental torture, Rs. 5,00,000, toward harassment through unfair trade practices and Rs. 1,00,000 toward litigation cost.

The commission noted that even after paying a considerable amount of consideration, the homebuyer neither obtained possession of the flat nor the amount refund made after withdrawal from the project.

Commission held that no one can be kept waiting for an extended period for possession of the flat allotted to him and he is granted the right to seek a refund of the amount paid by him with compensation.

Therefore, the Commission ordered that the amount of Rs. 46,88,001 together with an interest of 9% from the date of the last deposit be paid back within a period of 30 days. The Commission also directed the builder to pay Rs. 10,000 to the homebuyer for the mental and physical inconvenience caused.

Published by Voxya as an initiative to help consumers in resolving consumer complaints.

submitted by /u/Voxyacomplaintforum
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1gmfwrx/delhi_district_commission_orders_shree_vardhman/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...

Pool fill without engineer oversight

We are in the process of purchasing our first ever home in CA and we just discovered in the disclosures that the new build property we are purchasing previously had a swimming pool which was filled without an engineer onsite to approve the work (details from disclosure below). Is this something we should be concerned with or not? Is it something we should have additional inspections conducted on? We are originally from the UK and not really sure what to do with this information and if it is concerning or not. A POOL DID EXIST PREVIOUSLY. COPING, TILE, GUNNITE AND REBAR WERE ALL REMOVED AND DIRT AND CLEAN DRAIN ROCK WERE USED TO FILL IT IN. COMPACTED FILL WAS NOT USED AND NO ENGINEER APPROVED THE DIRT AND DRAIN ROCK FILL IN submitted by /u/tommot82 [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/dpyzw8/pool_fill_without_engineer_oversight/

Making offers on houses not listed for sale.

I want to buy a home for retirement. I am looking at lots of options, mostly focusing on the locations that appeal to me. I see lots of Zillow estimates of homes that look like great deals to me. Are these estimates accurate, even though similar houses in the same area that are for sale are usually priced much higher? If so, is it realistic for me to try to make offers to owners that do not have their homes listed? Would a realtor even consider helping me do this? Or, do these values indicate that the houses listed for sale are overpriced, and I should just lowball until someone accepts? Are houses today tending to sell far below list prices, or ??? submitted by /u/chewybrian [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1o4mcon/making_offers_on_houses_not_listed_for_sale/