I've seen tons of D.R. Horton, Lennar, or other mass home builder-related posts on here that seem to just say "DR Horton bad" without addressing the actual root of the problem. Having worked in the heavily regulated pharmaceutical industry / GMP manufacturing, It's clear to me that there needs to be some systemic change that incentivizes quality while maintaining quantity. The main argument against this is that increased costs will be transferred to the buyers when they're looking for affordable housing, and that increased regulations will hurt buyers. I think this is wrong, buyers are already being hurt by the quality issues seen with mass home builders' products. D.R. Horton homes are cheaper than the broader market, however insurers are insuring them as if they will last 30 years. Buyers may end up spending much more on repairs to the crappy homes, and possibly litigation, over the first 5 years of buying a home which they didn't anticipate. With impro...
It’s a designated monument and a contributor to a historic district with a very stringent design review board. Every repair would have to be approved by the city and the district board. Adu law is strong in my state, but the board can make me build in historical style, not visible from the street, and 750 square feet max. It’s also in a hillside zone, which triggers really expensive foundations compared to flat land. It is filled in to look flat though, and has been that way for a century. There’s small 1910 barn that has a permit on file, but the house itself is too old to have an original permit on file. It needs: 750k in “conforming” work done to it in order to max out its value at 900k. Even getting it habitable would be a tall order. It has a 6 foot tall brick foundation with almost no mortar left in the joints. One of the corbeled chimney tops is about to roll off the tall and very steep roof. A specialized historic mason will have to do all of that. Much of the 30 windows and...