Which is a better overall mortgage: 3.625% rate and 20% down ($50K), or 4.125% rate and 0% down, no PMI?
(Reiterating for formatting reasons)
I'm looking at two mortgage situations:
A) 3.625% rate and 20% down (which is $50K)
B) 4.125% rate and 0% down, with no PMI
I think the second option has a better overall value, especially if I put the 50K difference in the market.
But somehow, it doesn't feel right to pay for a higher interest rate. Any advice? I'd love someone to check my math too.
Here's my math:
A) Real cost over 30 years: -214,475.78
B) Real cost over 30 years: -284,906.62
50K invested over 30 yrs: 405,918.00
Total: 121,011.38
This means choosing plan B has a difference of netting me 335,487.16 more than plan A?
Tools used:
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/cwetko/which_is_a_better_overall_mortgage_3625_rate_and/
Comments
Post a Comment