Skip to main content

Republicans kill veterans housing assistance while monthly mortgage payments climbing hundreds of dollars higher and groceries, gas, and everything else also cost more

Veterans are losing homes because of GOP killing loan program

If there is an ounce of decency in MAGA’s soul, they will remember this on election day.

They had their own reasons for supporting and electing Republicans, despite the fact the president was a convicted sexual abuser and convicted tax cheat. Be that as it may they are now becoming aware of their poor choice.

They are now witnessing the collapse of their economy because of runaway inflation and exorbitant grocery bills. They are witnessing the collapse of their healthcare with the near total dissemination of Medicare and Medicaid and the closing of innumerable local hospitals. Their electric bills now are greater than their mortgage payments in some cases and gasoline prices are inhibiting their ability to drive to work. Their unions, on which they rely on to slow the depredations of rapacious employers are being challenged daily, and probably second worse to all, they have seen the lies about keeping us out of ‘forever’ wars’ be exposed as the blithering and blathering of a despot whose very sanity is being questioned on a daily basis as the president rants, and in the vilest words ever heard by our children, embarrasses us in front of the whole world.

What could be worse than all this, you ask? Maybe in his paranoia, he thinks the military is about to turn on him. So, in revenge for these fantasies, he has turned against our national heroes, our veterans, in one of the slimiest attacks this pond scum of an individual ever employed.

See this – Boldface mine:

Veterans are losing homes because of Republicans killing loan program

Opinion by Michael Embrich • 23h •

Following World War II, the G.I. Bill helped build the strongest middle class the world had ever seen. It gave ordinary Americans a path to homeownership and a real stake in the country they loved. Veterans and their families built communities, raised children, and strengthened schools and houses of worship. They fueled the growth of great cities, colleges, research universities, and a technological boom unlike anything the world had seen. Now that is ending.

Today, few young Americans can afford to buy homes. The president's answer? Fifty-year mortgages. I'm not a math whiz, but with the median age of buying a home at 40, that means no American will live to actually own their home outright.

But this is all by design.

The clearest example of where American homeownership is heading is the foreclosure disaster now unfolding for veterans and their families. Since this Republican administration killed the VA Servicing Purchase program, or VASP, more than 10,000 veterans lost their homes to foreclosure sales. Roughly 90,000 more were behind on their mortgages or already in the foreclosure process. It's unclear how many veterans would have been able to keep their home if VASP was left in place. The VA is quick to point out that there are "other reasons for foreclosures other than the absence of VASP," and there certainly are, but that doesn't mean that shutting down the program didn't cause veterans to lose their homes.

This was not some unforeseen accident. The mortgage industry warned that closing VASP without a ready replacement would lead directly to foreclosure. The administration did it anyway. But no matter how you slice it, you will pay for this idiotic move. VA loans are backed and guaranteed by American taxpayers.

What makes this especially cruel is that many of these veterans were not beyond saving. Some had enough disability compensation or other income to stay in their homes if they had been offered a workable repayment structure. Under VASP, thousands of struggling borrowers were able to get sustainable, low-cost mortgages. But the door was slammed shut with little warning, leaving veteran families stranded between bureaucratic failure and financial ruin.

This is what anti-veteran policy looks like in real life. It is not always loud. It does not always arrive wrapped in "suckers and losers." Sometimes it looks like paperwork, delay, indifference, and a government deciding that veterans can absorb one more hit.

It looks like monthly mortgage payments climbing hundreds of dollars higher while groceries, gas, and everything else also cost more.

And this disaster is unfolding inside a broader housing market that is already crushing ordinary Americans, especially younger families and first-time buyers. The share of first-time homebuyers has fallen to a historic low of just 21 percent. Their median age is now 40, another record. Meanwhile, repeat buyers are older, wealthier, and more likely to make large down payments or pay in cash. In other words, the housing ladder is being pulled up, and veterans are being told to climb anyway.

That matters because homeownership has long been one of the main ways veterans build wealth after service. It literally built the America we all enjoy today. Delay that by a decade, and you do not just postpone a purchase. You strip away years of equity, stability, and opportunity. Even the National Association of Realtors noted that delaying homeownership until age 40 instead of 30 can mean losing roughly $150,000 in equity on a typical starter home. For a veteran trying to move from service into civilian life, that is not an abstract statistic. That is the difference between them keeping and paying off a home before they age out of the workforce.

The president's answer to this crisis is not to restore strong protections for VA borrowers or expand affordable housing. Instead**, his administration floated the idea of a 50-year mortgage for all Americans. ** As stated, that is not a solution. It is a trap. Yes, it may shave a little off a monthly payment in the short term. But over time it would bury borrowers in vastly more interest and slow the building of equity to a crawl. One analysis found that on a $400,000 home, a 50-year mortgage could save about $250 a month but cost more than $378,000 extra in total interest compared with a standard 30-year loan. That is not restoring the American Dream. That is refinancing it into permanent indebtedness.

One of the greatest attributes of the G.I. Bill and the classic American homeownership model was that a mortgage could be paid off in 15 to 25 years. Allowing for second mortgages to pay for equity building, college funds, debt consolidation, vacation homes, et cetera. Unfortunately, we will never see such an affluent middle class in America again. No, really.

Giant firms like Blackstone continue expanding across the rental market**, buying up apartments, student housing, mobile home parks, and single-family homes in growth markets across the country**. The result is a housing system where large investors scale up, rents keep rising, and ordinary families are told to accept smaller futures. Veterans are supposed to compete in that market after losing the very safeguards designed to honor their service.

The president built his career and wealth on the same tactics that Blackstone uses. He was far less successful, but it shows that he is a true believer in mass property ownership for the few, not the many.

A country that can spend endlessly on war but will not protect veterans from losing their homes on the other hand, war is not just morally corrupt, it is a travesty.

Veterans were promised a path to the middle class. Instead, they are on a path to homelessness.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/realestate/veterans-are-losing-homes-because-of-Republican-killing-loan-program/ar-AA20EpBZ

submitted by /u/PrincipleTemporary65
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1sjftil/republicans_kill_veterans_housing_assistance/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...

Co-signing as non-primary resident - effect on size of required downpayment & first time home buyer status?

Contemplating co-signing on a house with my mom and splitting the mortgage payment. I currently have a significantly higher income and much better credit than her. I'm looking at potential home costs and related downpayments but have difficulty using some of the online estimators. From my perspective, this would be somewhat of an investment purchase (I intend to stay in my current location in a different state and contribute to the mortgage), however, for my mom, this would be a primary residence. For purposes of the downpayment size and the type of mortgage arrangement, would it be an investment property or a primary residence? Many thanks for any help. submitted by /u/piercalicious [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/km4hvl/cosigning_as_nonprimary_resident_effect_on_size/

Making offers on houses not listed for sale.

I want to buy a home for retirement. I am looking at lots of options, mostly focusing on the locations that appeal to me. I see lots of Zillow estimates of homes that look like great deals to me. Are these estimates accurate, even though similar houses in the same area that are for sale are usually priced much higher? If so, is it realistic for me to try to make offers to owners that do not have their homes listed? Would a realtor even consider helping me do this? Or, do these values indicate that the houses listed for sale are overpriced, and I should just lowball until someone accepts? Are houses today tending to sell far below list prices, or ??? submitted by /u/chewybrian [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1o4mcon/making_offers_on_houses_not_listed_for_sale/