Skip to main content

Seller has ongoing litigation against a lender involving an ADU loan

Hello, we are in contract to buy a real estate investment property in La Mesa, San Diego county.

During our due diligence we learnt that the seller has an active loan they took out to build an ADU from a lender called Mosaic. The seller was working with a general contractor firm who helped them file for the loan. The loan is about 100k at 10% APR over 10 years.

The lender paid the GC in full. Permitting for ADU was done, some construction work and inspection was finished (foundation was laid, utilities were brought in). The GC eventually vanished and files for bankruptcy. This was a big news in San Diego, GC being MultiTaskr.

There is a class action lawsuit against the lender implying them being part of a scheme with MultiTaskr that have defrauded hundreds of people in similar way.

Now, our title company says that there is no loan/lien associated with the property. There are no active judgements.

I am wondering if in future the seller loses the case and lender somehow gets a judgement against the seller instead can they place lien on the property retroactively. Would we have any potential exposure?

Title company says no. But I would like to get advise from folks here.

submitted by /u/coolkarniamit
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1h0zb3k/seller_has_ongoing_litigation_against_a_lender/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

North Carolina – “One to Buy; Two to Sell”

I realize I will likely have to contact a real estate attorney but also hoping to hear insights and experiences from others! I have a house in NC that I bought by myself in 2009, and paid off, in full, in 2022. I got married in 2023. My spouse and I have not lived in the house as our "marital residence". We have maintained separate residences even after we got married. (That a separate topic!). I am now selling this house. Realtors have told us that my husband has to sign the deed at time of transfer but I am not convinced since the house has not been our marital residence. The realtors like to use the phrase "one to buy; two to sell", which seems like a broad-stroke statement which is not applicable under all circumstances. And of course, the realtors don’t realize the details of my specific circumstances: I purchased and paid for the house in full prior to marriage Only my name is on the deed And most importantly, we have never lived in the house as a marit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Question With Tricon "Pending ID".....

My wife and i, along with 2 other peopl applied to rent a house, and our application says "Approved, Pending ID". Anyone else know what that means? Do we pretty much have the place or are we missing something? submitted by /u/Itskrueger [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1orixqj/question_with_tricon_pending_id/
Post a Comment
Read more

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...
1 comment
Read more