This is mostly just a random thought/question I had. An expression I've heard before is "don't pay for a view you don't own"; the reason being that the view isn't under your control and can change at any time. And yet, the view is typically priced into the home's value when being sold.
So, hypothetically, if something happens that causes the view to be negatively impacted (e.g. new buildings are constructed that block the view) doesn't that technically count as "damage" to the home, since the home's resale value will be impacted? In which case, shouldn't the view be something that is covered by homeowner's insurance the same as any other type of damage?
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1gazhf9/should_a_view_be_covered_by_insurance/
Comments
Post a Comment