Skip to main content

Next Steps After Stucco Inspection

Hi, looking for some perspectives on reasonable course of action in this situation. Have an offer in on a home in Southeastern PA. Like most areas, houses do not stay on the market long here these days. This house was on the market for 2-3 months in the winter, no bites. According to seller agent, feedback was that “crazy interior paint” was a turn off….they repainted, put it back on market in early summer. It sat for 3 weeks until we looked at it. Our agent felt it was a bit overpriced…cute house but was priced on par with newly renovated homes in the area (this had an addition put on 20 years ago so that part of house is nicer, but not brand new- and otherwise very old bathrooms, dingy carpet, and no garage whereas comps have 1-2 car garages. We are fine with all of this and will put a little work in. Listed at 725k, we landed at 700k w/ 12k seller credit. We said we will not nickel and dime for inspection items- just reserving the clause for anything major. Home inspection has a bunch of stuff but we are willing to take care of those. Unfortunately the invasive stucco inspection highlighted some big concerns. The original portion of the home is masonry construction so that stucco was not tested, but the addition (guessing about 60% of the home exterior) is all wood framing. The stucco is failing in a number of areas on the addition. It is much thinner than recommended. 3 of 3 exterior walls are missing flashing and weep screed, and 2 of 3 exterior walls have rot in the wood sheathing in various spots, including around windows. Remediation is recommended due to improper installation and they of course are unable to say how extensive damage to framing might be without more invasive testing or tearing stucco down.

I don’t want this to scare us off- but I just don’t want to overpay for the house as this could get very expensive and we will have to address it. I want to go back to the seller and ask for a reduced price based on estimates for remediation- but what exactly is that fair scope of work to get quoted? It definitely needs remediation, not just repair. I’m not interested in getting it re-stuccoed correctly- I t’s hard to even find someone to put stucco on in this area, it is possibly as/more expensive than siding since you need a real specialist to do it right and not a lot of contractors want to put it up. For this climate, it’s not the best long term solution. We want to stay put in this house. I would rather tear it down and replace with a good quality siding as many homeowners with stucco issues do. Is it reasonable to ask for a reduction in price close to that amount? And if so- would you price out replacement with just basic vinyl siding and we take on the cost difference if we wanted a better siding, or what? And cost for the whole house or just the addition? On one hand- the stucco on front of the house is supposedly fine but on the other hand, this house would look exceptionally weird with the addition done in siding and the front stucco. So we would definitely end up paying for the whole thing to be sided. Also- we wouldn’t know the extent of damage to framing underneath until the work begins so there is a risk that we could have to pay for a lot more than just stucco removal and residing.

I know this is going to be upsetting to the seller as they already had to come down on their list price (even if the evidence supports that it was overpriced- I get that it feels like a concession to them already). If they don’t want to make additional concessions given the stucco issue and we walk, I suspect they will just run into the same issues with other buyers. So I think it behooves them to come to an agreement with us and I hope they see it this way (I know I am biased here). We are not trying to take them to the cleaners, truly just want to reach a fair and level headed agreement for both parties. We are motivated to get this house but don’t want to shoulder 100% of the risk/expense here as this is a serious issue to take on. Any suggestions for the most reasonable way to approach this and what we would use to support/base our request for a price reduction upon?

submitted by /u/grey_elk
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1dlphwi/next_steps_after_stucco_inspection/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...

Pool fill without engineer oversight

We are in the process of purchasing our first ever home in CA and we just discovered in the disclosures that the new build property we are purchasing previously had a swimming pool which was filled without an engineer onsite to approve the work (details from disclosure below). Is this something we should be concerned with or not? Is it something we should have additional inspections conducted on? We are originally from the UK and not really sure what to do with this information and if it is concerning or not. A POOL DID EXIST PREVIOUSLY. COPING, TILE, GUNNITE AND REBAR WERE ALL REMOVED AND DIRT AND CLEAN DRAIN ROCK WERE USED TO FILL IT IN. COMPACTED FILL WAS NOT USED AND NO ENGINEER APPROVED THE DIRT AND DRAIN ROCK FILL IN submitted by /u/tommot82 [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/dpyzw8/pool_fill_without_engineer_oversight/

Making offers on houses not listed for sale.

I want to buy a home for retirement. I am looking at lots of options, mostly focusing on the locations that appeal to me. I see lots of Zillow estimates of homes that look like great deals to me. Are these estimates accurate, even though similar houses in the same area that are for sale are usually priced much higher? If so, is it realistic for me to try to make offers to owners that do not have their homes listed? Would a realtor even consider helping me do this? Or, do these values indicate that the houses listed for sale are overpriced, and I should just lowball until someone accepts? Are houses today tending to sell far below list prices, or ??? submitted by /u/chewybrian [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1o4mcon/making_offers_on_houses_not_listed_for_sale/