First time buyer located in So Cal, only qualify for about low $500K so my options are extremely limited.
Looking at two options: a yet-to-be built Lennar home, or a 1960s bungalow.
The bungalow is old, small (under 1200 sq feet.) will need cosmetic repairs, has a pool, big backyard, a je-ne-sais quoi charm to it.
The Lennar home is twice the size, tiny backyard, new BUT - carries the Lennar reputation which is pretty bad from my research. It’s also a track home and would give me “pleasantville” vibes.
The two options are pretty similar in price. So is a 70 year old home that is still standing a sign of a ‘good’ home or does it mean it will soon need a lot of work? And is a new home that will possibly be hastily and shoddily built be worth the hassle, given its larger size and newer amenities…
What would you choose?
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1656zrx/what_would_you_pick/
Comments
Post a Comment