Skip to main content

Does it make sense to have negative cash flow with VA loan (0 down)

First time home buyer/investor so any advice is helpful. I am looking to purchase a property soon (active duty using VA loan). I will be moving in 2025 because of military so I plan to either rent it out if it makes sense or just sell. Here is a brief summary of the markets I'm looking at.

Region A: high demand, low supply. Influx of old 50-70yo semi-retirees coming from NY, midwest, CA due to warm weather and bc it's along the water. 3BR/2BA houses that were 200K in 2020 are now selling for low to mid 300s. Small town that is heavily occupied by military and retirees. I could probably get ~2200-2300 on rent. Mortgage+prop taxes would be around $2K for a 300K house. I know there is also insurance, maintenance, capex, prop mgmt fees, hence the negative cash flow. But in my eyes, I put no skin in the game- I put 0 down, maybe some money in closing cost (but my realtor tells me the seller will be able to cover my closing) and the VA funding fee can get rolled into the loan. So worst case, I'd be putting down 6K, best case I put down pretty much just earnest deposit. So even though I'd be "losing" probs a few hundred per month if I rent when I leave, in my mind, that's not that big of a deal since I didn't have to lock down 3.5-20% down to begin with. does that logic make sense? Also, I can afford to "lose" that money each month- I can afford these payments currently just based on my salary (~$100K); my wife is finishing up school and will also makes around ~110K, so if we move and have a double mortgage, we can afford it.

Region B: similar landscape- also high demand, low supply and big mix of military and normal civilians but a much bigger city (300K pop vs <20K). Houses are definitely cheaper, esp in the suburbs, which I prefer. I could probably get the same house for 250K there. Rent is probably a little cheaper at 1900-2100. Definitely makes more sense from a cashflow perspective. The house appreciation is still there but I don't think is as strong. My biggest issue is that it would be a 1hr commute each way vs a 15 min. I don't really mind the commute (mil often have to do these long commutes) but 2hr RT (no traffic) does take away from a bit of my personal life, although I have no kids and my wife works long hours anyway so not that big of a deal. It will also take a toll on my car value (2008 civic) and i'd be burning gas. My estimation is that region b would be around 350/mo for gas + car depreciation vs 150/mo in region A, so basically a $200 additional expense in regionB, which would be around $5K over the 2 years i have to do it before moving.

TLDR: wondering whether negative cash flow makes sense but with VA loan in which i am putting essentially 0 down (maybe closing cost). Is it worth the gamble of living in the house for 2 years, then renting for a few more years at a negative and seeing if the market continues to appreciate in this tight market? Key point is that I am in the middle of nowhere (1 hour to the nearest costco if that tells you anything) but constant rotation/influx of military members and steady influx of retirees here, with very limited housing (buying or renting) options.

submitted by /u/wolfieofwallstreet
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/11cg6ep/does_it_make_sense_to_have_negative_cash_flow/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

North Carolina – “One to Buy; Two to Sell”

I realize I will likely have to contact a real estate attorney but also hoping to hear insights and experiences from others! I have a house in NC that I bought by myself in 2009, and paid off, in full, in 2022. I got married in 2023. My spouse and I have not lived in the house as our "marital residence". We have maintained separate residences even after we got married. (That a separate topic!). I am now selling this house. Realtors have told us that my husband has to sign the deed at time of transfer but I am not convinced since the house has not been our marital residence. The realtors like to use the phrase "one to buy; two to sell", which seems like a broad-stroke statement which is not applicable under all circumstances. And of course, the realtors don’t realize the details of my specific circumstances: I purchased and paid for the house in full prior to marriage Only my name is on the deed And most importantly, we have never lived in the house as a marit...

Question With Tricon "Pending ID".....

My wife and i, along with 2 other peopl applied to rent a house, and our application says "Approved, Pending ID". Anyone else know what that means? Do we pretty much have the place or are we missing something? submitted by /u/Itskrueger [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1orixqj/question_with_tricon_pending_id/

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...