Skip to main content

US - NM Buying a house and confused about rate locks

My husband and I are first time home buyers and are in the middle of buying a house. We are very well qualified so we're putting down only 3% and our PMI on a 340k home loan is less than $100/mo with a conventional loan. We rate shopped and ended up using a 5.75% rate from Better Mortgage to get Waterstone to decrease their rate from 6.5 to 5.99. We know we're going to get way better service from Waterstone vs having to chase an online company every step of the way, so we were happy with the higher rate for better service.

But then I went to sign the disclosures paperwork and noticed that rate is locked only for 30 days, putting us at Feb 9th for expiration. That was never going to work because closing is scheduled for Feb 17th. General inspection has revealed that the sellers are going to need to fix a big area of mold and water damage in the laundry room before we can close, so it may even get pushed out further.

I raised my concerns last week with the LO via email and did not hear back from him. Someone from his team called me yesterday and let me know if we don't get the file moving we're in danger of missing our closing date. I explained the rate lock situation to her and what she said in response was both confusing and worrying to me. She essentially told me it costs something like $70/day to extend a rate lock and that my realtor is very good so I can negotiate to get the sellers to pay that extra $800-900 for me. I told her I didn't think the sellers would agree to pay it because why should they when the closing date was agreed to by both parties in the original contract and they haven't caused any delays or pushed it? So I asked what would happen if we let the lock expire, because it really makes it seem like it was completely pointless to rate shop if they're going to just give me a 30 day lock knowing full well it isn't enough time and then hit me with nearly $900 in fees on the back end. I felt taken advantage of and I told her that. She said something about needing to let the file sit for 40 days and then we could reopen it but essentially we'd miss our closing and lose the house. I asked her to explain further and she basically told me to just sign it so it can move forward and she promised she's going to get us taken care of with the lock desk.

We're only using this company because my mother in law works there in underwriting and recommended this specific team, so there is a degree of trust but I feel like I'm being had on this one. On the flip side, this is my first time dealing with rate locks (I bought a home about 6 years ago but didn't have to deal with any of this kind of thing) so it's possible we are being frustrating little shits to the LO's team and I just don't understand it.

Any insight from those more experienced than me would be much appreciated!

submitted by /u/Nurse_On_FIRE
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/10kz3ev/us_nm_buying_a_house_and_confused_about_rate_locks/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...

Pool fill without engineer oversight

We are in the process of purchasing our first ever home in CA and we just discovered in the disclosures that the new build property we are purchasing previously had a swimming pool which was filled without an engineer onsite to approve the work (details from disclosure below). Is this something we should be concerned with or not? Is it something we should have additional inspections conducted on? We are originally from the UK and not really sure what to do with this information and if it is concerning or not. A POOL DID EXIST PREVIOUSLY. COPING, TILE, GUNNITE AND REBAR WERE ALL REMOVED AND DIRT AND CLEAN DRAIN ROCK WERE USED TO FILL IT IN. COMPACTED FILL WAS NOT USED AND NO ENGINEER APPROVED THE DIRT AND DRAIN ROCK FILL IN submitted by /u/tommot82 [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/dpyzw8/pool_fill_without_engineer_oversight/

Making offers on houses not listed for sale.

I want to buy a home for retirement. I am looking at lots of options, mostly focusing on the locations that appeal to me. I see lots of Zillow estimates of homes that look like great deals to me. Are these estimates accurate, even though similar houses in the same area that are for sale are usually priced much higher? If so, is it realistic for me to try to make offers to owners that do not have their homes listed? Would a realtor even consider helping me do this? Or, do these values indicate that the houses listed for sale are overpriced, and I should just lowball until someone accepts? Are houses today tending to sell far below list prices, or ??? submitted by /u/chewybrian [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1o4mcon/making_offers_on_houses_not_listed_for_sale/