Skip to main content

"House of Nightmares" follow up - Sold!

This one (as of this moment the video is still up, watch it while you can if you haven't, as new owners often take it down): https://www.redfin.com/CO/Colorado-Springs/4525-Churchill-Ct-80906/home/34515765 - when that was originally posted, we watched it go viral live in the thread, someone "3 hours ago" posted "omg it has 100k views just on redfin already!" - and I was looking at 200k views "3 hours" later.

This is the one where the original tenant's distant relation (of some sort) took over the rental house, didn't pay rent, got evicted, and destroyed the house when they were let back in to "collect their belongings," with year old meat in the unplugged freezer to boot (that's my memory from 1.5 months ago, I didn't re-watch video).

Thought you guys might like some context on what backs these types of business purpose (read: few/no consumer protections) acquisitions.

Here's a title report that shows some details about the buyer and the transaction. FYI your LO/Realtor can pull these, if you're ever curious about the transaction history of a property, digital records are accurate going back about 10 years, and get spotty before that. "F you Suzy!" was written all over the house, so I didn't black out the old owner's first name, I left it since there was speculation in the old thread about if "Suzy" was the landlord, an ex girlfriend, or what.

- After being listed for $592,500, "Enterprises LLC" got it for $580k.

- At closing, they took out a hard money loan from "Funding Inc" for $531k, which is about 91.5% LTV on the sticker price.

- 5 days later, they took out a private second mortgage from "John Doe" for $110k ("John Doe's" natural human given name appears on public records, not a business entity), putting the total CLTV (combined loan to value) at about 110.5% on the sticker price.

- Often times for these types of high risk hard money loans, they base the LTV/CLTV on the after repair value ("ARV" if you're a cool kid) (so they can internally justify the loan to themselves as being less risky than it actually is, at least as far as I'm concerned that's all they are doing), but that's an internal number we can only speculate on.

- The reason these folks can do this high risk financing and close quick, but Fred First Time Buyer can't, is because: a) Fred is going to owner occupy, so all the consumer protections to protect Fred from "predatory lending" (aka risky borrowing) kick in, and b) Fred has no track record of success at this (sorry, HGTV and "I worked for a contractor for 7 years" does not count). "Enterprises LLC" also has deep pockets, they aren't doing ~10% down because they HAVE to.

submitted by /u/aardy
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/ounot6/house_of_nightmares_follow_up_sold/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...

Pool fill without engineer oversight

We are in the process of purchasing our first ever home in CA and we just discovered in the disclosures that the new build property we are purchasing previously had a swimming pool which was filled without an engineer onsite to approve the work (details from disclosure below). Is this something we should be concerned with or not? Is it something we should have additional inspections conducted on? We are originally from the UK and not really sure what to do with this information and if it is concerning or not. A POOL DID EXIST PREVIOUSLY. COPING, TILE, GUNNITE AND REBAR WERE ALL REMOVED AND DIRT AND CLEAN DRAIN ROCK WERE USED TO FILL IT IN. COMPACTED FILL WAS NOT USED AND NO ENGINEER APPROVED THE DIRT AND DRAIN ROCK FILL IN submitted by /u/tommot82 [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/dpyzw8/pool_fill_without_engineer_oversight/

Making offers on houses not listed for sale.

I want to buy a home for retirement. I am looking at lots of options, mostly focusing on the locations that appeal to me. I see lots of Zillow estimates of homes that look like great deals to me. Are these estimates accurate, even though similar houses in the same area that are for sale are usually priced much higher? If so, is it realistic for me to try to make offers to owners that do not have their homes listed? Would a realtor even consider helping me do this? Or, do these values indicate that the houses listed for sale are overpriced, and I should just lowball until someone accepts? Are houses today tending to sell far below list prices, or ??? submitted by /u/chewybrian [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1o4mcon/making_offers_on_houses_not_listed_for_sale/