Skip to main content

"House of Nightmares" follow up - Sold!

This one (as of this moment the video is still up, watch it while you can if you haven't, as new owners often take it down): https://www.redfin.com/CO/Colorado-Springs/4525-Churchill-Ct-80906/home/34515765 - when that was originally posted, we watched it go viral live in the thread, someone "3 hours ago" posted "omg it has 100k views just on redfin already!" - and I was looking at 200k views "3 hours" later.

This is the one where the original tenant's distant relation (of some sort) took over the rental house, didn't pay rent, got evicted, and destroyed the house when they were let back in to "collect their belongings," with year old meat in the unplugged freezer to boot (that's my memory from 1.5 months ago, I didn't re-watch video).

Thought you guys might like some context on what backs these types of business purpose (read: few/no consumer protections) acquisitions.

Here's a title report that shows some details about the buyer and the transaction. FYI your LO/Realtor can pull these, if you're ever curious about the transaction history of a property, digital records are accurate going back about 10 years, and get spotty before that. "F you Suzy!" was written all over the house, so I didn't black out the old owner's first name, I left it since there was speculation in the old thread about if "Suzy" was the landlord, an ex girlfriend, or what.

- After being listed for $592,500, "Enterprises LLC" got it for $580k.

- At closing, they took out a hard money loan from "Funding Inc" for $531k, which is about 91.5% LTV on the sticker price.

- 5 days later, they took out a private second mortgage from "John Doe" for $110k ("John Doe's" natural human given name appears on public records, not a business entity), putting the total CLTV (combined loan to value) at about 110.5% on the sticker price.

- Often times for these types of high risk hard money loans, they base the LTV/CLTV on the after repair value ("ARV" if you're a cool kid) (so they can internally justify the loan to themselves as being less risky than it actually is, at least as far as I'm concerned that's all they are doing), but that's an internal number we can only speculate on.

- The reason these folks can do this high risk financing and close quick, but Fred First Time Buyer can't, is because: a) Fred is going to owner occupy, so all the consumer protections to protect Fred from "predatory lending" (aka risky borrowing) kick in, and b) Fred has no track record of success at this (sorry, HGTV and "I worked for a contractor for 7 years" does not count). "Enterprises LLC" also has deep pockets, they aren't doing ~10% down because they HAVE to.

submitted by /u/aardy
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/ounot6/house_of_nightmares_follow_up_sold/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

North Carolina – “One to Buy; Two to Sell”

I realize I will likely have to contact a real estate attorney but also hoping to hear insights and experiences from others! I have a house in NC that I bought by myself in 2009, and paid off, in full, in 2022. I got married in 2023. My spouse and I have not lived in the house as our "marital residence". We have maintained separate residences even after we got married. (That a separate topic!). I am now selling this house. Realtors have told us that my husband has to sign the deed at time of transfer but I am not convinced since the house has not been our marital residence. The realtors like to use the phrase "one to buy; two to sell", which seems like a broad-stroke statement which is not applicable under all circumstances. And of course, the realtors don’t realize the details of my specific circumstances: I purchased and paid for the house in full prior to marriage Only my name is on the deed And most importantly, we have never lived in the house as a marit...

Question With Tricon "Pending ID".....

My wife and i, along with 2 other peopl applied to rent a house, and our application says "Approved, Pending ID". Anyone else know what that means? Do we pretty much have the place or are we missing something? submitted by /u/Itskrueger [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/1orixqj/question_with_tricon_pending_id/

Aren't comps/CMAs useless with buyer credits at close happening now?

I'm looking into buying a new construction townhouse in my HCOL US city. I'm seeing builders offering interest rate buydowns worth $20k-$60k on $800k homes (rather than just lowering prices) in order to keep their comps high for their other units, now that buyer demand has been declining. I asked my agent about these, and he said these buydowns aren't even the full story: buyers can write all kinds of other credits into an offer, like their closing costs, prepaid sewer fees, etc. Apparently cash buyers can just write in a "buyer credit at close" for any amount in their offer. So a new townhouse that appeared to sell for $800k in the MLS might have actually been a cash offer with a $100k+ buyer credit at close, meaning the buyer only spent $700k or less in total, but to the rest of the world they can only see the $800k! So that made me realize I can't trust comps/CMAs for other new construction townhouses. The sales prices could be way lower than they appear...