All scenarios are in CA. Looking for your professional and personal inputs.
1.Notary public notarizes a power of attorney with someone using a fake ID, and in CA, a thumbprint is required. There is no thumbprint. This assumes that the notary does not know how to verify a fake ID is either incompetent or negligent. What are you opinions on a notary, the transaction and possible court outcome?
-
A mobile notary public notarizes a power of attorney with a fake ID at a parking lot at midnight. This assumes that the notary does not know how to verify a fake ID is either incompetent or negligent. What are you opinions on a notarization and the person with the fake ID?
-
You, the notary are being sued, and you are aware that you may be getting sued and you decide to leave/flee the country to avoid being served. What are your opinions on the notary?
-
You, the notary are being sued, and have been served by a lawyer representing multiples clients. Instead of answering the complaint, you've decided to run away. Case is now in entry of default. What are your opinions on this notary?
-
The client has placed his/her thumbprint in the notary's journal. However, the print is only a partial print. Top half, outer portion, inner portion, bottom portion. It is not a full legible and easily recognizable thumbprint. Secretary of State officials did not specify whether a fully legible thumbprint is required only that a thumbprint exists. What are your opinions on the partial thumbprint and the notary?
-
You, both a notary and a lender, are given a "notarized" real estate power of attorney. This "notarized" document is forged. No such notary ever notarized this power of attorney. You, the notary and lender, process the documents and complete the sale of the home. What are you opinions on this forged notarized document and the notary lender?
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/ehx9lq/real_estate_fraud_and_notary_negligence/
Comments
Post a Comment